AI Feature API Getting Started Guide

This guide is aimed at providing practical assistance to a developer or data scientist getting up to speed on the AI Feature API. Formal documentation is available on, and the swagger spec (detailed information for developers) is available via the Knowledge Hub page.

In order to make use of these examples, you will need to have:

Prepare Requested Parcel Polygons

Here we prepare a set of custom parcel polygons for use with the API. Each one represents a custom "Query AOI", which in this case represents one property parcel.

Note that all our AI data is in EPSG:4326 latitude/longitude coordinates. You may wish to take epoch into account (as at the survey_date provided by a given example) if transforming into a local coordinate referenced, to get the best geospatial accuracy. As presented, these results will align perfectly with the Nearmap imagery survey from which they were produced without adjustment.

Discover Available Classes: The "classes.json" endpoint

The "classes" endpoint is simple - it doesn't take any query parameters, and simply provides the list of IDs and Descriptions for every feature class you have access to on your account. If you add a new AI Pack, or we add new feature classes to your existing AI Packs, this will expand over time.

Bring Your Own Parcels: The "features.json" endpoint

This endpoint is the best one to use if you have access to your own parcel database. Usually, this will either be a local government entity who manages their own parcels, a parcel provider, or a larger organisation such as an insurance carrier with some level of GIS capability in house that has aligned with a particular provider's parcels as their internal source of truth for property boundaries. No property boundary data is used behind the scenes to produce this data, other than an "on-the-fly" query with the polygon you provide to the endpoint.

Get a first API Response

Assuming you have the API_KEY environment variable set to your Nearmap API Key. This API Key can be the same as the one used to access imagery, as long as it is pointing to the subscription on which you have Nearmap AI set up.

Input Parameters

The key parameters of interest are:

Understanding the Payload

Let's go through each of the top level sections of the response payload (i.e. the keys in the json file), and understand them as we go.


The number of Nearmap AI credits used in the query. Typically, a single property will correspond to 1 credit. Larger or composite custom parcels may consume more credits. Buffering the parcel polygon to check what is present nearby will also consume more credits (a single property surrounded by a grid of 9 properties will consume 10 credits if a buffer is used that is the size of a whole property. Note that credits will only be charged if a valid response is returned (e.g. if no AI data matches the query, an empty result is returned, and no credits are charged).


The version of the data (which includes the machine learning model, post processing algorithms, and processing pipeline configuration). This is tied to the data, rather than the API (different requests from the same endpoint may retrieve different versions of data at various times/locations). A detailed changelog of AI System data versions can be found on knowledge hub under

New attributes and changes are introduced from time to time, so please consider carefully how your application deals with versions.

A link to the location in Map Browser (based on both image capture date and lat/lon of parcel centre). This is exceptionally useful for troubleshooting, understanding whether the Nearmap AI result or some other internal data source is correct, and understanding why the Nearmap AI result may be wrong in some circumstances. We recommend enabling the relevant AI Layers after clicking the link, exploring different dates using the date picker, or using the 3D or oblique views.


The "features" is the meat of the payload, containing all the geospatial objects (features), and information about them (attributes) in a flat list. Each feature has:

Whole Payload

This is the representation of the entire payload for a single Query AOI.

Visualising the Payload

This is a convenient way of visualising the payload's results, and exporting into a geospatial file for use with a GIS system.

Explore some examples

Now we move through each of the sample parcel boundaries, to show a variety of cases.

Example ID 1 (Chicago Houses)

This example is an artificial hand drawn boundary around approximately 3 residential properties. It showcases a common issue with parcel boundaries. Where the parcel boundary is shifted relative to ground, it is reasonably common to retrieve a feature that clearly belongs to a neighbouring parcel, or to have a legitimate feature that extends beyond the queried parcel by some amount. While the on-the-ground accuracy of the imagery and AI can cause this, it is more commonly caused by parcel boundaries that have been digitised incorrectly (and there is a high degree of local variability in this!). One method to deal with this is to ignore any objects where area of the intersection of the feature and the parcel is small compared to the area of the feature, AND small compared to the size of the parcel. This allows you to retain small features that lie almost completely within the parcel, as well as large multi-parcel buildings, where enough of the building protrudes into the parcel that the parcel "substantially" contains some of the building.

Example ID 2 (Seattle)

This is a waterfront property, with a large, reasonably complex residential home. Note that this was a hand drawn polygon, and it uses two credits, because it covers what are technically two smaller parcels. We then calculate the number of square metres of water body within 30 metres of the building.

Example ID 3 (Omaha Townhouse)

This is a single parcel for a townhouse where the building extends over three blocks. It's important to ensure you don't discard buildings like this, and make a decision on whether to "crop" the building to the parcel (for the part of it belonging to this owner), or wish to analyse the building as a whole.

In this example, the building passes the above tests that we want it included, but an explicit decision is needed - are we interested in the whole physically connected building (which exists substantially both within and without the parcel), or just that part which falls within the parcel?

Example ID 4 (Omaha School)

This is a large hand drawn parcel around a school and its campus to show a typical payload from a large, complex set of buildings returning in one query.